Road to Freedom?
I want to preface this posting with the warning that I am most genuinely biased in that I believe in my ability to think, and I do not have a problem sounding rude or "opinionated" like a hot-heated little westerner when I believe my ideas have validity. At the same time I am a strong believer that people should things about things for themselves, because when they do think sufficiently enough I have confidence they will find a truth worth listening to. So I am about to go in directions some people would rather stay out of, at least keep at an ignorant arm's length (that's a long arm I haven't found the hand of yet). But I encourage you, if you are still reading, to look into some of these matters for yourself and make an initiative to start caring about some serious issues currently being avoided in polititcs.
In the past six months I have seen a number of documentaries that are so vital to the way we live, I think it should be mandatory that everyone in the world see them. They are ordered from the most recent back to this past summer.
1) Loose Change
Although not with absolute factual accuracy, this documentary has been re-edited three times already by 23 year-old Dylan Avery and crew to research serious gaps in the government's perspective of what happened on 9/11. It exposes and explores a number of incongruencies with what happened and what the government reported (false Osama Bin Laden confessions?; What happened to the fusillage from U93 and the plane that hit the Pentagon?), and pointed to a number of unexamined and unexplained facts that were (Why did both Towers fall so perfectly to the ground?; Why were demolition explosions inside of the Towers reported by eye-witnesses, firefighters, and video cameras?) It is clear that more research needs to be done in these areas, because our Bush keep shoving those Towers at us like a bad porn movie to excuse his unlimited extension of power in states of emergency and centralization of the 22 federal security "entities" (an honest quote from the president at http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/ ) into the Department of Homeland Security. Are we going to spit or swallow these lies? (Yes, I'm asking if you are a moral prostitute.)
2) Road to Guantanamo
This one is clearly as much entertainment (I supposed) as propaganda, but again the focus is the same: Bush lies, Americans swallow. He told us many times over that the place didn't exist. It does. He says we don't torture. Bullshit. This is pretty easy. So why aren't we doing anything about it? That brings me to #3...
3) The Corporation
Probably the most exciting for me as a psychology nut-job. The film is broken down into three parts:
1) A Legal "Person" explains how business entrepaneurs abused the Reconstruction Laws (by the way, intended to end slavery––keep that in mind, there is a terrible irony approaching) in order for a group of business investors to gain the collective right of legal citizenship. Meanwhile, these same legal "Persons" have used thei inanimacy to avoid prosecution and responsibilty that a normal human being world endure. And as any viewer of human nature knows (or a social psychology major), people diffuse responsibility in groups like drunk man needs to piss.
2) The Pathology of Commerce: Case Histories. I'm going to refer to another quote because it's just too hard to stay neutral on this one:
"To assess the "personality" of the corporate "person," a checklist is employed, using diagnostic criteria of the World Health Organization and the standard diagnostic tool of psychiatrists and psychologists. The operational principles of the corporation give it a highly anti-social "personality": it is self-interested, inherently amoral, callous and deceitful; it breaches social and legal standards to get its way; it does not suffer from guilt, yet it can mimic the human qualities of empathy, caring and altruism. Four case studies, drawn from a universe of corporate activity, clearly demonstrate harm to workers, human health, animals and the biosphere."
Basically we have been mind-whipped by a non-living "entity" that does not give a flip about our condition as long as we spend our money. In the cases of some industries––the funeral, private medical companies, and any company that tries to warp us into believing we need something we do not in order to survive, which is almost all––they actually thrive on our insanity. The more desperate, deranged, needy, depressed, impotent, incontinent, anxious, sick, unhealthy, stale, veal-like we become the more these "entities" profit. So here's another reason to say FUCK YOU! to economics and Adam Smith because your logic was always backwards and counterintuitive on a human and sincere level and now I can prove. (Honestly, the reason I did well in econimics is because I did the opposite of anything I felt was right. What does that tell you about the moral path our Western-domination globalization is taking?)
3) Minset dicusses who is going to step up and solve these problems, as well as who is responsible. I hate to be the doubting Salem here, but it is most definately all of us that support the system most. We want these products, we think we needs these trifles, we love our sodas and sitcoms and Hummers and cell phones and microwaves, and we've forgotten how to live without them once they have been introduced. Come to think of it, not one of things existed 100 years ago, most of them not even 60. The two previous generations really made some horrible choices buying into a more convenient society, which has in the last 30 years set us on a pace for destroying all of the Earth's life, if a fatal man-made catastrophe doesn't beat nature. And one thing I've been noticing lately is that the up-and-coming kids don't even know that nature exists. Some of my students would be perfectly contented living in a box with a TV and entertainment system of some kind. When I tell them that I go hiking, 90% cannot even say they've ever even been once. I'm terrified at the increasing velocity of falling objects, and I don't know if Newton's laws can hold up to the rate we're approaching. I breathe this air too goddammit and I want it sans-CO pollutants! The issue at hand is that everyone is linked, everyone is involved, everyone is now responsible, thanks to the trap-like net of technology and money, we are all sharing the consequences. Likewise, does anyone remember how this problem started? Think beer...of course, diffusion of responsibility! Now we have no choice but to own up to some of these issues and start giving a damn. We need to regain some of our potency and use the freedom and power we have as Westerners, since we have almost all of it, to correct a few problems. The movie, albeit more compassionately that yours truly, addresses all of the following:
Free trade, Human Rights, the need for Living Wages, Biohazards and their effect on Biodiversity and Stability, Natural Resource Conversation (mainly air and water), and Global Warming...
4) An Inconvenient Truth
I know Al Gore is probably the dorkiest guy possible to do this film, but he had the money and he cared about doing something important and I hope more people will start to give him some overdue respect. Granted the movie was a bit, personal and ego-compensating for losing the 2000 election––that's another story that should have been left to Michael Moore or someone else. Al Gore is just to smart and cares too much and real issues and not charisma for people to take him seriously, which is unfortunate. He should have been a scientist, not a politician, that is obvious. (A fun point, the words for actor and politician in Japanese have the same root. 役者=yakusha=actor and 役員=yakuin=an official/officer. Isn't that serendipitous?).
Anyway, I think is the first and most important place we need to focus our energy. Tell all of our petty little sandfights in the Middle East and jungle-gym skirmishes in other parts of the world to just simmer down. A world-wide peace treaty needs to be signed right now, if we are really a "securely" unified global community––UNITED UNDER ENGLISH––in order to make a future worth killing each other. No wonder the world has been turning fundamental over the last 30-40 years. We need a God-like mother now more than ever to say "Stop yelling for one goddamn minute or you're going to be with no Twinkie and no Cheers! Now, let's take a bath."
That reminds me, according to recent scientific studies, by the year 2050 all of the world's fisheries are predicted to collapse. Take it easy on Moby Dick for a while, please. Just let the over-consumed populations replenish, if they can. Tofu is good and it doesn't hurt anybody. Land animals are already our slaves so there is no worsening that situation, expect for that bird influenza thing that just broke out here in Miyazaki. I'm actually living in the largest fish-consuming country in the world (I believe that is accurate. I read it in a Japanese newspaper yesterday, I don't see why they would lie at their own expense.). I am going to, as my Japanese improves, start promoting campaigns to reduce clear-cutting China's forests for chopstick comsumption, start reducing fish intake, and start sabotaging big trucks that, although at a MPG rate that embarrasses the US, damages my lungs.
Please comment if you want to add to my army, or if you have any qualms. Either way, I really hope you think about this stuff, and I would love to talk more about it with anyone.